West Side Ramp (1938) er det maleri, som Daniel Koerner er bedst kendt for; det befinder sig på Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington, D.C.. Vores katalog indeholder 2 værker af Daniel Koerner. Her er de 2 mest berømte, med årstal, museum og historien bag hvert lærred.
Rangordnet efter vores popularitetsscore, som kombinerer søgninger, besøg og ordrer for hvert værk. Opdateret november 2026.
De 2 museer, der rummer flest af malerierne på denne side.
| Museum | By | Værker af Daniel Koerner | Malerier fra denne liste |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington, D.C. | 1 | West Side Ramp | |
| New York | 1 | Farm in Moonlight |
De daterede lærreder af Daniel Koerner på denne side stammer alle fra 1938: her er de, i rækkefølge efter berømmelse.
West Side Ramp (1938)
Daniel Koerner, født i 1909, var 29 år gammel: West Side Ramp er fra 1938.
2 værker af Daniel Koerner er i vores katalog.
Primært i Smithsonian American Art Museum (Washington, D.C.) og Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York); listen ovenfor nævner hvert museum og dets lærreder.
I 1938, som udgør 2 af de 2 værker på denne side, herunder West Side Ramp.
Daniel Koerner lived a life defined by the intersection of visual expression and social advocacy. Born in 1909, he moved through the mid-century American art scene not merely as a painter, but as a cartoonist and an active participant in the labor movements of his time. His work was often inseparable from the political climate of the era, reflecting the tensions and the organized efforts of artists seeking stability and recognition during the Great Depression.
His involvement in the Federal Arts Project was a defining chapter. Through his correspondence and manuscripts, we see a man deeply engaged with the mechanics of artistic survival. He was part of the complex discussions surrounding the Woodrum relief bill and the support for the Federal Arts Bill, navigating the precarious waters of government-sponsored art and the rights of the creators themselves.
Koerner’s output was diverse, spanning the delicate precision of illustration to the broader strokes of painting. As a cartoonist, he possessed a keen ability to distill complex social realities into singular, impactful images. This skill made him a natural fit for the burgeoning movements of artist unions and international organizations that sought to unify the creative community.
His legacy is found as much in his advocacy as in his aesthetics. He was a figure in the Artists' Union and the Artists League of America, contributing to the discourse on how artists should exist within a modern society. His papers reveal a man who understood that the brush and the pen were tools for both personal expression and collective action.