James Lambert의 모든 작품 중 A River Scene with Thatched Huts by a Bridge over a Weir (1767)이(가) 가장 유명하며, 뉴헤이븐에 위치한 예일 영국 미술관에 전시되어 있습니다. 우리 카탈로그에 수록된 James Lambert의 작품 2점 중 가장 찬사받는 2점을 소개합니다. 각 작품은 제작 연도, 소장 미술관 및 작품에 얽힌 이야기를 함께 보여줍니다.
각 작품의 검색, 방문 및 주문 수를 결합한 인기 점수를 기준으로 순위를 매깁니다. 11월 2026 업데이트됨. 이 페이지의 모든 작품은 린넨 캔버스에 수작업으로 제작된 유화 복제화 또는 원하는 크기로 제작 가능한 파인 아트 프린트로 주문하실 수 있습니다.
이 페이지에 있는 작품을 가장 많이 소장하고 있는 1개의 미술관
| 소장 미술관 | 도시 | James Lambert의 작품 | 이 목록의 작품들 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 뉴헤이븐 | 2 | A River Scene with Thatched Huts by a Bridge over a Weir, Figures with a Donkey and Dog Crossing a Weir |
1767년 한 해 동안 James Lambert가 그린 모든 작품이 이 페이지에 담겨 있습니다. 가장 유명한 작품부터 만나보세요.
A River Scene with Thatched Huts by a Bridge over a Weir (1767)
1725년에 태어난 James Lambert은(는) 42세였으며, A River Scene with Thatched Huts by a Bridge over a Weir은(는) 1767년의 작품입니다.
James Lambert의 작품 2점이 카탈로그에 있습니다.
대부분 예일 영국 미술관 (뉴헤이븐)에 소장되어 있습니다. 위 목록은 각 미술관과 해당 미술관의 작품 목록을 나타냅니다.
이 페이지의 총 2점의 작품 중 2점이 1767에 제작되었으며, 그중 A River Scene with Thatched Huts by a Bridge over a Weir입니다.
예일 영국 미술관, 뉴헤이븐은 이 페이지에 있는 작품 중 2점을 소장하고 있으며, 그중에는 A River Scene with Thatched Huts by a Bridge over a Weir 및 Figures with a Donkey and Dog Crossing a Weir이(가) 포함되어 있습니다.
네, 이 페이지에 있는 모든 작품은 각 작품의 상세 페이지에서 원하시는 크기의 수작업 유화 복제화 또는 파인 아트 프린트로 주문하실 수 있습니다.
James Lambert was a man of dual disciplines, operating as both a painter of scenery and a musician. Born in Jevington, Sussex, he spent his life anchored to the landscape of the region, specifically around Lewes. His work was not the product of formal academic training but of practical necessity and local demand. He functioned as a herald painter, decorating inn signs, and later transitioned into a more precise recording of the English landscape. His ability to capture the specificities of Sussex architecture and topography makes his body of work a vital visual record of the eighteenth-century English countryside.
His technical development likely began with the influence of George Smith, a distant relative who provided the necessary instruction in landscape painting. This foundation allowed him to move beyond mere signage into the realm of commissioned views. By the 1770s, Lambert was producing watercolours that documented historic buildings, a task that required a keen eye for structural detail and a disciplined hand. He was not merely an observer; he was a documentarian of the antiquities of his home county.
Lambert’s significance lies in his meticulous documentation of a disappearing world. His output was substantial, including several hundred watercolour drawings created for Sir William Burrell. These works focused on the antiquities of Sussex, providing a level of detail that transcends simple landscape art. He was also commissioned by John Elliot to produce views of antiquities, ensuring that the physical history of the region was preserved through his brush. His work appeared in significant historical publications, including the works of Thomas Walker Horsfield and John Watson's History of the Earls of Warren.
His professional reach extended to the formal art institutions of the era. Between 1768 and 1778, he exhibited at the Free Society of Artists and the Royal Academy of Art. This participation in major exhibitions demonstrates that his skill was recognized by the contemporary establishment, even if his roots remained firmly in the local soil of Sussex. He was assisted in his later years by his nephew, James Lambert, who helped manage the heavy workload of his prolific output.
To understand Lambert, one must acknowledge his life as a musician alongside his life as a painter. He served as the organist for the church of St Thomas-at-Cliffe from 1745 until his death. His musical contributions were not incidental; he published volumes of psalms and hymns, showing a command of composition that matched his visual precision. While some contemporary accounts suggested he was a better painter than a musician, the reality is that he was competent in both, maintaining a professional presence in the cultural life of Lewes through two distinct mediums.
His death in Lewes marked the end of a career defined by local utility and historical preservation. He left behind a legacy of specific, localized imagery that remains essential for anyone studying the topography and architecture of eighteenth-century Sussex. His paintings are not mere decorations; they are evidence.