The artwork displayed on this page is protected by copyright law, which means we cannot legally create or sell an identical reproduction. This protection is enforced under international agreements such as the Berne Convention and by national laws, including those outlined by the U.S. Copyright Law - Title 17.
As a respectful and legal alternative, we offer custom, hand-painted artworks inspired by the original. Our skilled and professional artists carefully study the original's style, mood, and artistic essence to create a new, unique piece that evokes the same feeling - while remaining an original creation in its own right.
This method fully complies with copyright regulations because it does not involve copying or duplicating the protected artwork. Instead, it is a creative reinterpretation - a new painting that is influenced by the original but not identical to it.
Hand-painted oil on canvas in your size and frame, made to order by our artists. ( Switch to Print
Switch to Digital Image)
Pick from our preset sizes that match the artwork's original proportions.
Type the width and the height you need, to fit your frame or your wall. This is hand-painted, so for a size with a different shape the artist can paint a bit more around the picture, or cut a bit — you choose. We send you a digital mockup to approve before the painting starts. The picture shown on this page does not show the real result — only the mockup does.
Worldwide Delivery () in 3/4 weeks instead of standard 5 weeks. (21 October). No compromise on quality.
Flash--November 22, 1963
Reproduction Size
Andy Warhol's *Flash—November 22, 1963*, created in 1968, is not a painting that offers solace or beauty in the traditional sense. Instead, it confronts us with the raw, unsettling aftermath of national trauma – the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. This series, comprised of eleven screenprints, isn’t about mourning the man so much as dissecting *how* America mourned, and how that grief was mediated through the burgeoning power of mass media. The image presented—two male heads against a searing red background—is deliberately stark, almost clinical in its presentation. One figure's tie is loosened, pulled downwards, suggesting a disruption of order, a loosening of control mirroring the nation’s shock. The faces themselves are not portraits in the conventional sense; they are archetypes, stand-ins for the collective American psyche grappling with an unimaginable loss.
Warhol's choice of medium – silkscreen printing – is crucial to understanding the work’s impact. Having honed his skills in commercial illustration, Warhol understood the power of reproduction, of taking an image and multiplying it, stripping away its aura of uniqueness. This technique perfectly suited his exploration of how news events were disseminated and consumed in the 1960s. The flat, graphic quality of the screenprints mimics the look of newspaper photographs, emphasizing their status as mediated representations rather than direct experiences. The bold red background isn’t merely aesthetic; it evokes alarm, urgency, and even violence – the color of breaking news, of emergency broadcasts. It's a visual equivalent to the insistent “news flash” that gave the series its title. Warhol wasn’t interested in creating a reverent memorial; he was dissecting the spectacle of grief, exposing how easily tragedy could be absorbed into the relentless cycle of consumer culture.
To fully grasp *Flash—November 22, 1963*, it’s essential to understand its historical context. The assassination was a watershed moment in American history, shattering a sense of postwar optimism and innocence. Warhol, ever attuned to the pulse of popular culture, recognized that this event would be endlessly replayed and analyzed in the media. He wasn't simply documenting the tragedy; he was commenting on our collective obsession with it. The repetition inherent in the screenprinting process reinforces this idea – the image is presented not as a unique work of art but as one iteration among many, mirroring the constant stream of news coverage that saturated American life at the time. The series isn’t about remembering Kennedy; it's about remembering *how* we remembered him, and how that memory was shaped by external forces.
Even today, decades after its creation, *Flash—November 22, 1963* retains a powerful emotional resonance. It serves as a chilling reminder of the fragility of life, the pervasiveness of media influence, and the complex relationship between art, politics, and public memory. The work’s enduring appeal lies in its ability to provoke discomfort, to challenge our assumptions about grief and spectacle. For collectors and interior designers alike, a reproduction of this iconic series offers more than just aesthetic value; it provides a potent conversation starter, a visual embodiment of a pivotal moment in American history, and a testament to Warhol's genius for capturing the zeitgeist of his time. It is a work that demands attention, prompting viewers to confront not only the past but also their own relationship to trauma and the media landscape.
A Stats page exists for "Flash--November 22, 1963". It charts the monthly visits of the artwork and of the artist's other works, with country and language breakdowns.
The square format of "Flash--November 22, 1963" by Andy Warhol is recommended for a living room. Format and space together guide the placement of a reproduction.
The creation of "Flash--November 22, 1963" by Andy Warhol is dated 1968.
Born Andrew Warhola Jr. in 1928 within the industrial landscape of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the man who would become Andy Warhol spent much of his early years shaped by confinement and quiet observation. A childhood bout with Sydenham's chorea, or St. Vitus’ Dance, kept him indoors for long stretches. During these periods, he turned to the imagery provided by his mother: comic books and movie magazines. These were the first seeds of a visual vocabulary that would later embrace the mass-produced. He eventually moved toward formal training at the Carnegie Institute of Technology, earning a degree in Pictorial Design in 1949.
His arrival in New York City marked a transition from the private world of sketches to the public sphere of commercial illustration. Working for names such as Tiffany & Co., Vogue, and Harper's Bazaar, he mastered the precision required by advertising. This period of professional service instilled in him an understanding of how images are manufactured and distributed. He learned the mechanics of the brand before he ever attempted to deconstruct it.
By the 1960s, his focus shifted from illustrating products to treating the products themselves as subjects. Through the adoption of the silkscreen printing process, he introduced a method that mirrored the repetitive nature of consumer culture. This technique allowed for a detachment from the hand of the artist, favoring a flattened, mechanical aesthetic. His studio, known as The Factory, became a central point for a specific New York social circle. It was a space where musicians, poets, and film personalities gathered, often blurring the lines between their private lives and their public personas.
His work during these years explored several distinct themes:
This era was not without physical consequence. In 1968, a radical feminist writer named Valerie Solanas entered his Manhattan studio and shot him, leaving him with lasting injuries. This event altered the trajectory of his studio life, moving it toward a more business-oriented enterprise.
Beyond the canvas, Warhol was an active filmmaker who produced over 600 films between 1963 and 1968. Many of these were experimental or static in nature. He utilized long, unblinking takes in works like Sleep and Empire to challenge how an audience consumes moving images. His filmic output often featured his "superstars," a group of personalities from the Factory scene who became part of the cultural fabric of the time.
His influence reached into the music industry through his management of The Velvet Underground. He even designed the famous banana cover for their debut album, further merging the boundaries between fine art and popular media. By the time of his death in 1987, he had moved through various media—photography, publishing, and television—leaving behind a body of work that interrogated the very nature of what it means to be seen in a media-saturated age.
1928 - 1987 , United States of America