Paper

Student Artwork Guide

The killer

Name Class Date

Edvard Munch, The killer (1906). Public domain.

The facts

Artist
Edvard Munch topimpressionists.com/en/artists/edvard-munch/
Artist’s dates
1863 – 1944
Painted
1906
Medium
Acrylic On Canvas
Movement
Expressionism Colour and shape deliberately distorted so the picture shows an emotion rather than a likeness.
Period
Modern
Artistic style
Symbolic
Influences
Fauvism, Die Brücke
Notable elements or techniques
Exaggerated forms & vibrant colors
Subject or theme
Psychological turmoil

In context

The killer — Edvard Munch

When was this painted?

  1. 1860
  2. 1870
  3. 1880
  4. 1890
  5. 1900
  6. 1910
  7. 1920
  8. 1930
  9. 1940

Shaded: the lifetime of Edvard Munch (1863–1944) ▲ this work, 1906

Compare with

  • The Scream, 1893 topimpressionists.com/en/art/edvard-munch-the-scream-8XXU48-en/
  • Melancholy, 1894 topimpressionists.com/en/art/edvard-munch-melancholy-8XXU3N-en/
  • Madonna, 1894 topimpressionists.com/en/art/edvard-munch-madonna-8YDETZ-en/

Pick one work above: name two things it shares with this one, and one thing that's different.

More works to set beside this one: topimpressionists.com/en/art/similar/edvard-munch-the-killer-6WHKCS-en/

Colours

Measured from the image

    Main colour

    Phthalo Green #29281e

    Catalogued palette

    • #29281E
    • #B6A07C
    • #675337
    • #AE7739
    Palette
    Dark The dominant colour family in the image.
    Main colour name
    Phthalo Green
    Intensity
    Balanced How saturated and varied the colours are, from a single toned-down hue to many bright ones.
    Contrast
    Bold How much the colours differ in lightness and saturation across the picture.
    Harmony
    Strong Color Unity How well the colours work together, from clashing to fully unified.
    Brightness
    Balanced How light or dark the picture reads overall, from deep shadow to bright highlight.
    Saturation
    Balanced Soft How pure and strong the colours are, from near-grey to fully vivid.

    About this artwork

    The killer — Edvard Munch

    The Killer

    Edvard Munch, a Norwegian artist renowned for his contributions to Expressionism, created "The Killer" in 1906. This painting is a testament to Munch’s ability to evoke powerful emotions and introspection through his art. It stands as a cornerstone of Expressionist aesthetics, capturing the anxieties and psychological complexities characteristic of the era.

    Expressionist Elements

    The Killer” exemplifies the Expressionist style, characterized by exaggerated forms and vibrant colors that convey intense emotional experiences. The woman in the painting sits on a bed, her back turned to the viewer, creating an air of mystery and contemplation. This deliberate positioning disrupts conventional portraiture, prioritizing psychological impact over realistic representation. The dining table with fruit and birds adds a sense of tranquility, contrasting sharply with the title's ominous tone—a juxtaposition that underscores Munch’s exploration of duality within human experience. These elements are rendered in bold hues – reds, yellows, and blues – reflecting the turbulent inner landscape of the artist.

    Symbolism and Interpretation

    The painting can be interpreted as a profound reflection of Munch’s own emotional turmoil following the tragic loss of his sister Sophie. The woman's turned back symbolizes isolation or introspection, mirroring Munch’s preoccupation with grief and vulnerability. The fruit represents life and vitality—a poignant counterpoint to mortality—while the birds could signify freedom or, perhaps more subtly, the observer’s perspective on this internal struggle. This complex interplay of symbols invites viewers to ponder the deeper meaning behind “The Killer,” prompting contemplation about themes of loss, fear, and existential questioning. Munch himself described his inspiration as stemming from a vivid vision during a sunset walk—a moment of overwhelming terror that he sought to translate onto canvas.

    Artistic Influences

    Munch was significantly influenced by various art movements, including Fauvism, which is evident in his use of bold colors and expressive brushstrokes. Artists like Henri Matisse championed this stylistic approach, prioritizing emotional resonance over accurate depiction. His work also reflects the influence of Die Brücke, a group of German Expressionist artists who sought to break away from traditional representational art and forge their own path toward artistic innovation. They rejected academic conventions in favor of raw emotion and distorted forms—a spirit that aligns perfectly with Munch’s artistic vision.

    Relevance in Modern Art

    The Killer” remains significant in modern art for its emotional depth and symbolic richness. It continues to inspire contemporary artists and captivate audiences with its enigmatic presence, serving as a reminder of the enduring power of art to communicate profound psychological truths. Its influence can be seen in works exploring themes of trauma, anxiety, and vulnerability—demonstrating Munch’s lasting legacy as a pioneer of Expressionism.

    Edvard Munch's "The Killer" is a prime example of Expressionist art.

    The painting’s symbolism invites multiple interpretations, making it a subject of ongoing artistic discussion.

    Munch's influence can be seen in the works of other notable artists, such as Hermann Max Pechstein and Egon Schiele.

    Conclusion “The Killer” by Edvard Munch is a masterpiece that encapsulates the essence of Expressionism. Its mysterious and contemplative atmosphere, combined with its symbolic elements, make it a compelling piece of art that continues to intrigue viewers today.

    For those interested in exploring more works by Edvard Munch and other Expressionist artists, visit Edvard Munch: The Killer on AllPaintingsStore. Additionally, learn about the artistic movements that influenced Munch's work at Die Brücke.

    Artist and museum

    Artist

    Edvard Munch

    Born in Adelsbruk, Sweden

    A Life Shrouded in Shadow: The World of Edvard Munch

    Edvard Munch, born in 1863 amidst the stark landscapes of Norway, was an artist whose work became synonymous with the anxieties and emotional turmoil of the modern age. His life, deeply marked by loss and a pervasive sense of melancholy, served as the wellspring for his profoundly expressive art. From a childhood shadowed by the early deaths of his mother and sister – both claimed by tuberculosis – Munch developed a haunting preoccupation with mortality, sickness, and the fragility of human existence. These experiences weren’t merely biographical details; they became the very core of his artistic vision, fueling a relentless exploration of the inner landscape of fear, grief, and longing. His father's strict religious beliefs and own struggles with mental illness further contributed to a sense of dread that permeated Munch’s world, shaping not only his personal life but also the symbolic language of his paintings. He wasn’t simply depicting scenes; he was externalizing an internal state, translating psychological distress into visual form.

    The Genesis of Expression: Influences and Artistic Development

    Munch's artistic journey began with formal training at the Royal School of Art and Design in Kristiania (Oslo), but it was his encounter with the bohemian circles and the nihilist philosophy of Hans Jæger that truly ignited his creative fire. Jæger encouraged Munch to abandon conventional academic styles and instead delve into the depths of his own subjective experience, a concept he termed “soul painting.” This pivotal shift marked the beginning of Munch’s distinctive style – one characterized by raw emotion, distorted forms, and a rejection of naturalistic representation. His travels to Paris in the 1890s exposed him to the burgeoning Post-Impressionist movement, where he absorbed influences from artists like Paul Gauguin, Vincent van Gogh, and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec. The bold use of color, expressive brushstrokes, and psychological intensity of these masters resonated deeply with Munch’s own artistic inclinations. He wasn't merely imitating their techniques; he was synthesizing them into something uniquely his own – a visual language capable of conveying the most profound and unsettling human emotions. His time in Berlin also proved crucial, bringing him into contact with playwright August Strindberg, whose exploration of psychological themes further fueled Munch’s artistic investigations.

    Iconic Visions: Major Works and Their Symbolic Weight

    Munch's oeuvre is populated by images that have become deeply ingrained in the collective consciousness. The Scream, perhaps his most iconic work, transcends its status as a painting to become a universal symbol of existential angst. The swirling, fiery landscape and the figure’s contorted face embody a primal scream against the indifference of the universe. Madonna, a controversial and deeply personal piece, explores themes of sexuality, motherhood, and mortality with unsettling frankness. Recurring motifs like The Sick Child – inspired by the loss of his sister Sophie – serve as poignant reminders of Munch’s childhood trauma and the ever-present specter of death. Melancholy I & II, powerful depictions of profound sadness and isolation, reveal a vulnerability that is both deeply personal and universally relatable. These works aren't simply representations of external reality; they are windows into the artist’s soul, offering viewers an unflinching glimpse into the darkest corners of the human psyche. Munch didn’t aim to create beautiful images; he sought to convey truth – even if that truth was painful and unsettling.

    A Lasting Legacy: Historical Significance and Enduring Influence

    Edvard Munch's contribution to modern art is immeasurable. He stands as a pivotal figure in the development of Expressionism, paving the way for artists who prioritized subjective emotion over objective representation. His unflinching exploration of universal human experiences – love, loss, anxiety, and death – continues to resonate with audiences today, solidifying his place as one of the most influential and enduring figures in art history. His work profoundly impacted subsequent generations of artists, influencing movements like German Expressionism and beyond. He dared to confront the darker aspects of the human condition, challenging conventional notions of beauty and artistic representation. Even after achieving fame and recognition – culminating in the establishment of the Munch Museum in Oslo – his personal life remained turbulent, marked by periods of mental instability and isolation. Yet, through it all, he continued to create, leaving behind a body of work that continues to provoke, challenge, and inspire. Munch’s legacy isn't just about the paintings themselves; it’s about the courage to confront the complexities of human existence and to translate those experiences into art that speaks to the deepest parts of our being.

    Where to read more

    Find this online

    QR code linking to the download page for The killer

    topimpressionists.com/en/art/download/edvard-munch-the-killer-6WHKCS-en/

    Cite this artwork

    MLA
    Munch, Edvard. The killer. 1906, https://topimpressionists.com/en/art/edvard-munch-the-killer-6WHKCS-en/
    APA
    Munch, Edvard (1906). The killer [Painting]. https://topimpressionists.com/en/art/edvard-munch-the-killer-6WHKCS-en/
    Chicago
    Edvard Munch. The killer. 1906. https://topimpressionists.com/en/art/edvard-munch-the-killer-6WHKCS-en/
    Harvard
    Munch, Edvard (1906) The killer. Available at: https://topimpressionists.com/en/art/edvard-munch-the-killer-6WHKCS-en/

    Look closely

    The killer — Edvard Munch

    Look closely

    Answer in your own words. There are no wrong answers here — only answers you can explain.

    1. What catches your eye first, and why?
    2. Which colours or shapes create the mood — and what is that mood?
    3. Our catalogue files this work under: woman, bed, fruit. Do you agree? What would you add, or take away?
    4. Look back at The Scream (1893), earlier in this guide. Name two things it shares with this work, and one that is different.
    5. Expressionism: Colour and shape deliberately distorted so the picture shows an emotion rather than a likeness. Where can you see that in this work?

    Your response

    Write a short paragraph about this artwork. Use the facts from the earlier parts of this guide, and your answers above.